What voluntary patient enrolment means for GPs and their patients

InSight+ explores MyMedicare, a new voluntary patient registration model, now available in GP clinics.

The Australian Government’s new MyMedicare model, a form of voluntary patient enrolment (VPE), became available to Australian general practice clinics earlier this month. 

The government presents MyMedicare as a model that formalises the relationship between all Australian patients, their general practice, general practitioner (GP), and primary care teams.

Australia has operated under a blended model primary care funding, with a mixture of fee-for-service with Medicare rebates, bulk-billing and private health care.

Some GPs see VPE as a slippery slope towards a capitated funding system, similar to the system in the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. In a fully capitated funding model, a government pays a capped amount to general practice clinics per enrolled patient, with those fees tied to certain goals and measures of achievement.

MyMedicare is a model that formalises the relationship between all Australian patients, their general practice, general practitioner , and primary care teams (Monkey Business Images / Shutterstock)

Concerns the government is “increasing its bargaining power”

Dr Chris Irwin is a GP running two specialist clinics in Melbourne. Dr Irwin campaigned against capitation at last year’s Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) elections.

“Firstly, we need to call a spade a spade: if voluntary patient enrolment contains capitated payments, you can call it whatever you like; it is a capitated system. You can’t ‘1984 your way out’ of that fact,” said Dr Irwin.

“After we accept that we’re endorsing a capitated system, we need to ask who is in control and what they want.

“GPs want to provide the best quality care to the people in front of us. The last two decades of both Labor and Liberal governments in Australia have shown that government’s primary interests are cost containment, data mining, and increasing the bureaucratic control.”

Since the Medicare rebate has not increased with inflation in the past 20 years, the most vulnerable patients experience barriers to health care, Dr Irwin said.

“The inevitable outcome of any blended payment model if the Medicare Benefits Schedule is not indexed to actual inflation – because, right now, it’s indexed to the wage price index – is that it just makes the fee payments less in real terms.

“If the [Australian] government has the aims I believe it has, then the most rational thing to do would be to do what they’re doing: start a thin wedge of capitation with the small payments and continue to underfund the fee-for-service component,” Dr Irwin said.

“You don’t need to cut fee-for-service funding. All you need to do is let inflation take its toll until fee-for-service payments become unimportant to the total funding model.”

“It is a way for the government to increase its bargaining power in the relationship long term.”

MyMedicare introduces “no extra funding”

Dr Irwin has concerns that MyMedicare contains no extra funding.

“MyMedicare doesn’t do anything apart from cherry-picking a couple of telehealth fee-for-service item numbers that used to be available for all patients, and putting them back in,” Dr Irwin said.

“There’s no extra funding. There will be of course, because that’s the whole point of it: to introduce the capitated bit later on.”

Dr Irwin acknowledges that there is no perfect way of funding the health system.

“My main criticism is that many of the academic arguments for capitation only happen in a system in which you could trust the payer,” said Dr Irwin.

“At the end of the day, what seems like the most logical thing the government will do? The same thing it has done for the past two decades? Or do we think they’ll turn a new leaf?”

GP fears of capitation may be based on the UK’s experience

Professor Jane Hall, a Distinguished Professor of Health Economics at the University of Technology, Sydney, said the fear of capitation among GPs are often based on experiences in the UK.

“I think that to blame the trials and tribulations of the NHS on capitation for primary care is going too far,” Professor Hall said.

“Capitation is just a different way of paying for GP services. It reinforces the relationship between patient and GP, because it pays the GP to have that relationship. We know … incentives can be quite powerful.”

“[In a] fee-for-service system, we’re always concerned about the level of servicing … and a lack of flexibility about how those primary care services are provided.”

Professor Hall pointed to three types of health care funding: capitation, fee-for-service and bundled payments.

“Each system has strengths and weaknesses,” Professor Hall said.

“Health systems are moving to more complex systems … to improve the performance. Fee-for-service has several shortcomings: we don’t know that there is a strong continuity of care.

“We don’t know that medical practices feel responsible for the whole of their patient’s health. That’s why I think it can be positive moving to this more blended model.”

More detail needed regarding MyMedicare

Professor Hall called on the Department of Health to provide more detail about MyMedicare and its intentions.

“Under capitation, one of the issues is, are people being given enough care, or is there some skimping going on? And the logic is that the advantage of voluntary patient enrolment is that the patient isn’t then stuck in one practice,” Professor Hall said.

“Are we paying [GPs] enough and fairly to make it worth their while to invest in those systems that patient enrolment should support?”

Professor Hall said that detail regarding the MyMedicare program via the Department of Health website does not currently offer detail.

“The detail must be worked out because they’ve started enrolling patients,” Professor Hall said.

Subscribe to the free InSight+ weekly newsletter here. It is available to all readers, not just registered medical practitioners.